Enchanter ideas | Fri Sep 25 09:28:58 2009 MST |
| Just curious what anyone else would think about possibly adding more damage types to the Enchanter guild in regards to weapon enchants. My reasoning behind this is pretty simple - to be able to more readily include multiple warriors/lurkers in EQ/EXP parties and given the more dtypes. Now before the flame, please note that this would require MORE team-work simply because a warrior would very very rarely also be an enchanter. Not only that, but enchanters (to my knowledge) very rarely train and/or use the two (fire/cold) weapon enchants anyway. Lastly, I don't expect these enchants to completely convert the once entirely physical damage to entirely cold, fire, etc. I am thinking something along the lines of a gem blaster - where they do /mainly/ x-damage type and still a percentage of physical, etc. I don't expect to have ALL dtypes available via enchanter, but even seeing Poison and Acid enchants would be pretty neat. Q |
>Enchanter ideas | Fri Sep 25 14:27:52 2009 MST |
| On Fri Sep 25 09:28:58 2009 Quillz wrote post #218: > very rarely also be an enchanter. > Not only that, but enchanters (to my knowledge) very rarely train > and/or use the two (fire/cold) weapon enchants anyway. > Lastly, I don't expect these enchants to completely convert the once > entirely physical damage to entirely cold, fire, etc. I am thinking > something along the lines of a gem blaster - where they do /mainly/ > x-damage type and still a percentage of physical, etc. > I don't expect to have ALL dtypes available via enchanter, but even > seeing Poison and Acid enchants would be pretty neat. > Q Empower weapon is awesome too I think there are only multiple dtypes because there are tons of weapons with dtypes.. Pikes/kamas/wyrnbanes/lightning blades, etc. Maybe they don't want to hand feed a warrior. |
>>Enchanter ideas | Fri Sep 25 14:29:20 2009 MST |
| On Fri Sep 25 14:27:52 2009 Esoteric wrote post #219: > > something along the lines of a gem blaster - where they do /mainly/ > > x-damage type and still a percentage of physical, etc. > > I don't expect to have ALL dtypes available via enchanter, but even > > seeing Poison and Acid enchants would be pretty neat. > > Q > Empower weapon is awesome too > I think there are only multiple dtypes because there are tons of weapons > with dtypes.. > Pikes/kamas/wyrnbanes/lightning blades, etc. Maybe they don't want > to hand feed a warrior. hand feed me plz |
>Enchanter ideas | Sun Sep 27 06:35:24 2009 MST |
| >I don't expect to have ALL dtypes available via enchanter, but even >seeing Poison and Acid enchants would be pretty neat. >Q
In general, this idea has merit. For the sake of variety between guilds however, any additional dtypes offered by enchanter should probably be other than those already offered by the Woodsman tree. Holy and Unholy wouldn't really make sense either, but Magical definitely would. Perhaps Asphyxiation as well? |
>>Enchanter ideas | Wed Sep 30 02:50:42 2009 MST |
| On Sun Sep 27 06:35:24 2009 Tranquil wrote post #221: > >I don't expect to have ALL dtypes available via enchanter, but even > >seeing Poison and Acid enchants would be pretty neat. > >Q > > In general, this idea has merit. For the sake of variety between > guilds however, any additional dtypes offered by enchanter should > probably be other than those already offered by the Woodsman tree. > Holy and Unholy wouldn't really make sense either, but Magical > definitely would. Perhaps Asphyxiation as well? I would say magical is totally logical, since why wouldn't the weapon do magical damage when you coat it with a layer of magical energy. If an admin gives the green light, I would volunteer to get the spell out. |
|