small population | Sat Jan 13 08:40:39 2024 MST |
| Since we have such a small population, and few to bitch any longer. Why are we limiting the ability to play with one another? for example singing a person, then not being to party with them. I understand this is a grey area, yet it has been for years and was fine. now, its something that is frowned on by who? 2 people? there are like 20 heads that play, and we should be able to play, not limited by this bullshit. the idea is to let us play together, simple, easy. love it, hate it, let it be. love, me |
>small population | Mon Jan 15 11:39:24 2024 MST |
| On Sat Jan 13 10:40:39 2024 Tatra wrote post #1099: > singing a person, then not being to party with them. > I understand this is a grey area, yet it has been for years and was fine. > now, its something that is frowned on by who? > 2 people? > there are like 20 heads that play, and we should be able to play, not > limited by this bullshit. > the idea is to let us play together, simple, easy. > love it, hate it, let it be. > love, > me You can play with which ever player(s) you wish. There's no game side limitation imposed on this really.
What is currently barred is doing a min/max by using your alts to boost one character, and then have a different of your alt benefit from it by playing with the boosted character.
I guess I just don't agree with the framing of this as a limitation of which players can play together.
The limitation is on leveraging multiple characters for purely min/max reasons.
One thing that may be a little limiting is the "don't switch chars to resurrect your own group" thing. I think this could be helped by doing something like reducing the initial penalty on the boat, and then maybe having successive boat rides impose a higher tax that decays over time /shrug.
Makes way more sense to me than "let the rules allow me to log in 4 alts to buff up this woodsman and then group with them on my evoker main". |
|